STATINS: therapy statement of my personal opinion
The following article reflects my current opinion and thoughts concerning the underlying causes of cardiovascular disease and why I think we are off course. Study it out for yourself. Personally, I do not think the focus is correct in blaming “cholesterol” as the cause.
It is my opinion that statin therapy has too many risk factors. There are links to memory, mood and dementia, diabetes, myalgia and muscle weakness, cardiomyopathy, fatigue, mitochondrial and liver dysfunction. Anybody taking a statin should take co-enzyme Q-10 as the statins can block its production in the liver and it is a key molecule used for the production of energy in all muscle cells, including the heart.
Statin does a great job in lowering cholesterol, but if cholesterol is not the primary causative factor then your risks continue. Studies show that it takes about two years to reveal a divergence in the curve in relation to lives saved. There have been many studies over the years on improving mortality figures. Some of these studies show that it saves 1:200 or 1:300 lives. The best study I have seen is 1 in 35 people. Chelation studies beat that. I read an article years ago concerning the accuracy of the statin benefit theory. That article suggested that the primary cause was inflammation and that the statin drugs have a mild anti-inflammatory effect and that this is the benefit we see from the therapy.
If that is the case, then the primary focus should be on reducing inflammation. This can be accomplished by an anti-inflammatory diet (takes some discipline), omega oils (2-4 grams/d) and items such as curcumin/tumeric. So ponder the article below.
If you choose to take a statin, then make sure you get on a high quality Co-enzyme Q-10 product, that may help protect you against some of the listed side effects (which can include myopathy, muscle weakness, dementia, diabetes, increase in all cause mortality, myalgia). The Q 10 issue has been known since the 1960’s and should be a recommendation for all who are prescribed statins. There have been many studies over the years. It takes about two years before you can see a health benefit. Multiple studies show that it saves 1 life in every 200-300 people. The best study that I have seen is 1 life in 35 after two years. The chelation study showed better results that that, but you don’t see very many doctors sharing that information. Dr. JTH
Statin drug industry generates OBSCENE PROFITS from institutional lies about cholesterol and the oversimplification of heart disease 08/27/2024 // Lance D Johnson
Cholesterol, often vilified as the main driver of heart disease, is actually an essential component to cellular health. It plays a crucial role in various biological functions, including building cell membranes, producing hormones, and aiding in the absorption of vitamins. Cholesterol is a necessary nutrient that our bodies cannot produce on their own, so it’s important to get vitamin D from sunlight, and to consume foods that contain cholesterol to maintain healthy cholesterol levels.
But today, doctors are indoctrinated and incentivized to push statin drugs on people at an early age, while ignoring all the dietary and lifestyle factors that influence heart disease risk. The oversimplification of the causes of heart disease leads to widespread pill-pushing that benefits a statin drug industry that's built on a history of lies.
Big Pharma capitalizing on heart disease myths
The pharmaceutical industry has long profited from the widespread belief that high cholesterol is a primary cause of heart disease. This notion has fueled a booming market for statin drugs, which have become a staple of cardiovascular care, forcefully interfering with cholesterol levels. Major pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Merck, have invested heavily in developing and marketing statin medications, reaping substantial financial rewards along the way.
According to Data Bridge Market Research, the U.S. statin market size was valued at $4.53 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $5.10 billion by 2031. This growth is driven, in part, by the increasing prevalence of high cholesterol among adults, particularly those aged 40-59.
However, the link between high cholesterol and heart disease has been challenged over the past five years, with researchers pointing out manipulated, industry-sponsored studies that overstate the correlation between the two. The predatory financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry have played a significant role in shaping public perception and medical practice.
The American College of Cardiology developed a simple calculator that proposes to determine one’s risk of a heart attack or stroke within the next ten years. The calculator uses blood pressure, cholesterol level, smoking status and age to make this determination. This calculator is used to pressure patients into taking statins, while ignoring the various dietary and lifestyle factors that predispose a person to heart disease.
Vilification of cholesterol ignores the damage caused by sugar and inflammation
The vilification of cholesterol began with the work of Ancel Keys. Keys conducted a study of seven countries, which suggested a strong correlation between saturated fat consumption and heart disease. However, these studies have been criticized for methodological flaws and selective data reporting, with critics pointing out that results would be different had he relied on data from seven different countries, such as Finland, Israel, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, France and Sweden.
At around the same time period, John Yudkin argued that sugar and processed food were driving inflammation of the cardiovascular system. His research was overshadowed by Keys’ hypothesis that cholesterol was the culprit. The sugar industry, especially the high fructose corn syrup industry, is really at the heart of this controversy. Internal documents reveal that the industry bribed scientists to downplay the link between sugar consumption and heart disease, shifting the blame onto saturated fat and cholesterol. This tactic helped to protect the sugar industry's profits while promoting the consumption of sugary products.
Additionally, the risk assessment tools used by healthcare providers to determine the need for statins have been found to be inaccurate. These tools often overestimate the risk of heart disease and oversimplify the causes, leading to unnecessary statin prescriptions. A holistic prevention strategy would include foods that reduce inflammation of the cardiovascular system. Fiber-rich foods help modulate cholesterol. Healthy fats such as avocados, are great. It's the processed foods -- the cookies and cakes with trans fats -- that should be avoided.
The widespread belief in the cholesterol-heart disease connection and the indoctrination of healthcare providers has led to the over-prescription of statin drugs in young people. Many individuals who are at low risk of heart disease are being prescribed statins, exposing them to unnecessary side effects which include accelerated aging and mitochondrial dysfunction. In one study, COVID-19 outcomes are more severe for individuals with low cholesterol, suggesting that statin drugs cause immune-deficiencies that lead to worse outcomes for infectious disease.
Statins may have applications in old age, but this approach to cardiovascular health should be viewed with caution, especially when these pills are recommended as a one-size-fits-all solution for heart disease prevention in younger and middle-aged adults.